Asymptotic Distribution of the Limited Information Maximum Likelihood Estimator and the Two-Stage Least Squares Estimator

The LIML and 2SLS estimators of a have the same asymptotic distribution. In this subsection we shall derive it without assuming the normality of the observations.

We shall derive the asymptotic distribution of 2SLS. From (7.3.4) we have

Подпись: (7.3.5)yfT(a2s – a) = (Г-*ZJ PZ^-‘r-^Z; Pu,.

The limit distribution of VT(d2s — a) is derived by showing that plim T~lZ PZ, exists and is nonsingular and that the limit distribution of T~i/2Z[ Pu, is normal.

First, consider the probability limit of T~lZ PZ,. Substitute (ХП, + V,, X,) for Zx in T~ lZ PZ,. Then any term involving У, converges to 0 in probability. For example,

plim T~lX[ X(X’X)-lX’Vl = plim T~lX X(T~lX, XrlT-lX, Vl
= plim Г-’Х; X(plim T-‘X’X)-1 plim Г^Х’У, = 0.

image503

The second equality follows from Theorem 3.2.6, and the third equality follows from plim r^’X’V, = 0, which can be proved using Theorem 3.2.1. Therefore

Furthermore, A is nonsingular because rank (П10) = У,, which is assumed for identifiability.

Next, consider the limit distribution of T’_1/2Z,1Pu1. From Theorem 3.2.7 we have

Подпись: (7.3.7)-Lz’Pu rn’iX,"L >/T|_ x; J *’

where=means that both sides of it have the same limit distribution. But, using Theorem 3.5.4, we can show

■ iV(0, crfA). (7.3.8)

Thus, from Eqs. (7.3.5) through (7.3.8) and by using Theorem 3.2.7 again, we conclude

mchs – a) -> ЩО, aA"1). (7.3.9)

To prove that the LIML estimator of a has the same asymptotic distribution as 2SLS, we shall first prove

plim л/Г(А — 1) = 0. (7.3.10)

We note

Подпись: (7.3.11)х~1ТТш’

which follows from the identity

ifW’1/2W, W’l/2i; <J’W<5 rfn

where г/ = W U2S, and from Theorems 5 and 10 of Appendix 1. Because

Подпись:<nv,<y (V-yOW. O,-/)’

image507 Подпись: (7.3.12)

we have

_ u;[X(X’Xr’X’ – X,(Xi X,)-‘Xi]u, uJMu,

Therefore the desired result (7.3.10) follows from noting, for example, plim r-^uJXtX’Xr’X’u, = 0. From (7.3.3) we have

yff(dL-a) = [T-1 ZJPZ, – (A – Dr^ZJMZ,]-1 (7.3.13)

X [T-^ZJPu, – (A – OT^ZJMu,].

But (7.3.10) implies that both (A — l)r_1ZJMZ, and (A — )T~mZJMu, converge to 0 in probability. Therefore, by Theorem 3.2.7,

VT(dL – a) = >/f(Z; PZ, Г *Z{ Pu,, (7.3.14)

which implies that the LIML estimator of a has the same asymptotic distribu­tion as 2SLS.

Leave a reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>